1) Regulatory changes: To require a background check for every gun sale.
b)
I think this
opportunity exists because people have been concerned abut gun laws and safety
in this country for the better part of two years now.
c)
The prototypical companies
affected are the ones that are responsible for organizing background checks or
help citizens organize themselves for a background check. The opposite can also
be true for gun manufacturers, who may see slower sales due to less people being
eligible to own a firearm.
d)
I think it is relatively easy to exploit because it seems inevitable that some type of
regulation will be placed on acquiring firearms via background checks. If it is
not through this regulatory law, it will be from another. Currently this law
needs to pass the House, so it is a long ways from being passed, which provides
potential benefactors to prepare for the opportunity.
I may
view this as an opportunity while someone else may not primarily because I believe
that advocates for gun control will speak louder than advocates for current gun
laws. In addition, I think our current House and Senate is composed of
individuals who are in favor of gun regulations. Someone else might have a
different political view and choose not to see this as a possibility of occurring,
and thus not a potential opportunity.
2) Regulatory changes: Revising FTC standards for safeguarding
consumer information
b)
I think this opportunity exists because cyber
attacks and cyber security has become extremely prevalent in the last several
years as big data is increasing. Events in the news like the Equifax scandal have
shed light on consumer privacy issues.
c)
The companies that benefit are those engaged in internet security, cloud security, and help collect data on consumers.
d) I think it may be difficult to exploit at this current stage since we do not know what the new standards will look like. When we receive more detail from the FTC, companies who provide security and collect data will be able to begin changing their systems to abide by the new laws. If they quickly and successfully implement the new systems,
they will be able to obtain market share form non law abiding competitors.
I may
view this as an opportunity while someone else may not primarily because I am
very personally concerned for my security. I am very cautious of someone
stealing my personal information via the internet, so I try to keep up with what
type of websites have had data breaches as well as methods cyber attackers use
to exploit customers and their data. Since this is important to me, I may view
this more significantly than someone else who hasn’t thought much about the
data large corporations collect on us via the internet.
3) Economic changes: Consumers preference shows they are drinking
less alcohol
b)
I think this
opportunity exists because we have hard data on alcohol volumes as described in
the article. I also think it exists because I think this is a trend that
continues long term.
c) The primary benefactors are non-alcoholic beverage companies who nw will see higher demand for their products, as well alcoholic beverage companies that can adapt to new
consumer preference.
d)
I think it will be
easy to exploit this opportunity as many large alcoholic beverage companies have
significant capital to expand into new product lines. For example, Coors can
either buy a non-alcoholic beverage company or potentially develop a new
product and use their well-known brand name.
I may
view this as an opportunity while someone else may not primarily because I am
in the age group that is leading the change in consumer preference. Since millennials
are primarily the one’s engaging in mindful drinking, we are aware of how
legitimate this trend is, while other generations may view this as a temporary thing.
4) Economic changes: Consumers preference shows they are drinking
less alcohol
b)
I think this opportunity exists because we have survey data
that exists as well as well-known consumer sentiment opposing politically infused
ads.
c)
The party with the
greatest opportunity are strong brands with solid marketing tactics that keep a
political view on the sideline during the Super Bowl. The companies that focus
on their products and do not try to relate to viewers political views will succeed.
d)
I think it will be
easy to exploit this opportunity as companies advertising during the Super Bowl
simply do not have to include politics in their ad. If they want to be risky
and include a political view, they may be faced with opposition. This should be
a breath of fresh air for companies as they know exactly what consumers want to
see: an ad focused on the business’s product.
I may
view this as an opportunity while someone else may not primarily because I have
a strong distaste for political based advertisement, especially when I am watching
the Super Bowl. Seeing a blatantly obvious politically infused advertisement makes
me angry when I should be enjoying watching football. I am more likely to
boycott that business if they rub me the wrong way. Someone else might enjoy
listening to a subliminal politcal argument during the Super Bowl, so they
might not think companies should follow through on refraining from political based
arguments.
Hey Matt! It's interesting that you discussed revising FTC standards for safeguarding consumers' information because I also said something similar. I talked about how it would be nice if there was a government-sponsored database that consumers could access and see which companies are using their information and in what ways. Nonetheless, there are many strides to be taken in this arena as cyber privacy is becoming a growing concern, especially after Facebook's scandal!
ReplyDeleteThe post portion about the local car mechanic poses a problem that has gone on too long. Theft against consumers. Can you report them, yes. Does it do much good, probably not. The mechanic who took advantage of the woman could have gone to court and she could have won. But is he held accountable to his next customers? Where does it end? It seems that business owners should be put on probation for their business to stay open if they are convicted of crimes. So that they have to report what they are doing to each customer’s vehicle and why. Sometimes a post on Angie’s List isn’t enough.
ReplyDeleteHey Matt! I enjoyed reading about the opportunities that you came up with. The one that stuck out to me the most is the first opportunity. Guns are a very controversial topic in today's society. I think that more extensive gun laws would help our problem in the US. It isa citizen's constitutional right to bear arms, but times have changed so certain laws need to change with the times.
ReplyDelete